[18F]DCFPyL PET/CT versus [18F]fluoromethylcholine PET/CT in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer (PYTHON): a prospective, open label, cross-over, comparative study.

PURPOSE: Primary objective was to compare the per-patient detection rates (DR) of [18F]DCFPyL versus [18F]fluoromethylcholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), in patients with first prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical recurrence (BCR). Secondary endpoints included safety and impact on patient management (PM). METHODS: This was a prospective, open label, cross-over, comparative study with randomized treatment administration of [18F]DCFPyL (investigational medicinal product) or [18F]fluoromethylcholine (comparator). Men with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after initial curative therapy were enrolled. [18F]DCFPyL and [18F]fluoromethylcholine PET/CTs were performed within a maximum time interval of 12 days. DR was defined as the percentage of positive PET/CT scans identified by 3 central imaging readers. PM was assessed by comparing the proposed pre-PET/CT treatment with the local treatment", defined after considering both PET/CTs. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients with first BCR after radical prostatectomy (73%; median PSA = 0.46 ng/ml [CI 0.16;27.0]) or radiation therapy (27%; median PSA = 4.23 ng/ml [CI 1.4;98.6]) underwent [18F]DCFPyL- and/or [18F]fluoromethylcholine -PET/CTs, between July and December 2020, at 22 European sites. 201 patients completed the study. The per-patient DR was significantly higher for [18F]DCFPyL- compared to [18F]fluoromethylcholine -PET/CTs (58% (117/201 patients) vs. 40% (81/201 patients), p < 0.0001). DR increased with higher PSA values for both tracers (PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/ml: 26/74 (35%) vs. 22/74 (30%); PSA 0.5 to ≤ 1.0 ng/ml: 17/31 (55%) vs. 10/31 (32%); PSA 1.01 to < 2.0 ng/ml: 13/19 (68%) vs. 6/19 (32%);PSA > 2.0: 50/57 (88%) vs. 39/57 (68%) for [18F]DCFPyL- and [18F]fluoromethylcholine -PET/CT, respectively). [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT had an impact on PM in 44% (90/204) of patients versus 29% (58/202) for [18F]fluoromethylcholine. Overall, no drug-related nor serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint of this study was achieved, confirming a significantly higher detection rate for [18F]DCFPyL compared to [18F]fluoromethylcholine, in men with first BCR of PCa, across a wide PSA range. [18F]DCFPyL was safe and well tolerated.

99mTc-besilesomab (Scintimun) in peripheral osteomyelitis: comparison with 99mTc-labelled white blood cells.

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of osteomyelitis is a challenge for diagnostic imaging. Nuclear medicine procedures including white blood cell imaging have been successfully used for the identification of bone infections. This multinational, phase III clinical study in 22 European centres was undertaken to compare anti-granulocyte imaging using the murine IgG antibody besilesomab (Scintimun) with (99m)Tc-labelled white blood cells in patients with peripheral osteomyelitis. METHODS: A total of 119 patients with suspected osteomyelitis of the peripheral skeleton received (99m)Tc-besilesomab and (99m)Tc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (HMPAO)-labelled white blood cells (WBCs) in random order 2-4 days apart. Planar images were acquired at 4 and 24 h after injection. All scintigraphic images were interpreted in an off-site blinded read by three experienced physicians specialized in nuclear medicine, followed by a fourth blinded reader for adjudication. In addition, clinical follow-up information was collected and a final diagnosis was provided by the investigators and an independent truth panel. Safety data including levels of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) and vital signs were recorded. RESULTS: The agreement in diagnosis across all three readers between Scintimun and (99m)Tc-HMPAO-labelled WBCs was 0.83 (lower limit of the 95% confidence interval 0.8). Using the final diagnosis of the local investigator as a reference, Scintimun had higher sensitivity than (99m)Tc-HMPAO-labelled WBCs (74.8 vs 59.0%) at slightly lower specificity (71.8 vs 79.5%, respectively). All parameters related to patient safety (laboratory data, vital signs) did not provide evidence of an elevated risk associated with the use of Scintimun except for two cases of transient hypotension. HAMA were detected in 16 of 116 patients after scan (13.8%). CONCLUSION: Scintimun imaging is accurate, efficacious and safe in the diagnosis of peripheral bone infections and provides comparable information to (99m)Tc-HMPAO-labelled WBCs.

123I-N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-2-iodobenzamide: a potential imaging agent for cutaneous melanoma staging.

Melanoma is a neoplasia of dramatically increasing incidence that has a propensity to spread rapidly. Early detection is fundamental and patient management requires reliable, sensitive and reproducible staging methods, such as a single examination by planar scintigraphy or single-photon emission tomography (SPET) using a radiopharmaceutical with selectivity for melanoma tissue. Among iodobenzamides reported to possess an affinity for melanoma, a new compound, N-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-2-iodobenzamide (BZA(2)), was selected for a clinical trial in view of its pharmacokinetic experimental profile in melanoma-bearing mice. Planar whole-body scintigraphy using (123)I-BZA(2) was performed in 25 patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma. Performance was evaluated in two groups of patients with one or more documented secondary lesions ( n=13) or with no known secondary lesions ( n=12), and results were compared with those of conventional investigation techniques. No adverse clinical or biological events were recorded. Lesions were imaged by increased tracer uptake, and good quality images were obtained 4 h after administration. After a follow-up of more than 1 year, the overall results of (123)I-BZA(2) scintigraphy on a per patient basis showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 95%, a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 100%. The proven secondary lesions were imaged with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91%. In seven patients with suspected metastases, the absence of (123)I-BZA(2) uptake was confirmed as true negative, and in one patient without suspected metastases, (123)I-BZA(2) scintigraphy revealed a gastric lesion. Hence eight diagnoses would have been modified by (123)I-BZA(2) scintigraphy data. (123)I-BZA(2) allowed discrimination between benign and malignant lesions and, in the case of malignancies, between those of melanomatous origin and others. This compound, which is selective for melanoma tissue, appears promising for the staging and restaging of melanoma.